What do the ruins say? What ruins are silent about and pyramids whisper - reflections on the history of the world ← Hodor

Here our historians have a striking split. When you need to confirm the official chronology. They loudly talk about “one hundred thousand miles of years BC,” and when they need to make money that can be easily cut, they howl to the whole world about the need to urgently save the world heritage property, which is under the protection of UNESCO. Humanly speaking, their salaries are small. But you need to have a conscience! How is it that it stood for 12 centuries without falling, but here, if 6,122 rubles 79 kopecks are not allocated, then by spring the world will lose its precious heritage!

In fact, the truth is in the middle. Thank God it is possible to track changes that have occurred over a hundred years with the same natural objects. The advent of photography provided such an opportunity. And it turned out that the level of wear from natural impact on rocks is ten times too high. What is dated back five to seven centuries turns out to be 80-100 years old. It just seems that cities made of granite and basalt can stand brand new for a thousand years, exposed to rain, winds and temperature changes. In fact, what was recorded by painters at the end of the 18th - beginning of the 19th century could be only 300-500 years old.

Added at 18:06
But in my opinion, this may not be true either. You need to understand what these structures were built from before they turned into ruins. And this is a very important question. So, this stone is not really a stone. This is travertine, which is essentially a local variety of simple limestone. The Izborsk fortress was built from material with similar properties, and in three hundred years without repair it turned into not only ruins, but hills irregular shape!

Added at 18:07
Therefore, everything suggests that this beauty was built about a hundred years before it was “photographed.” And it’s not surprising why it happened that most of the ruins were stolen by livestock breeders into sheds and barns. The disaster occurred around 1700 according to traditional chronology. This is not pointing a finger at the sky. The year 1700 is very mysterious. Not for one year, of course, but it was at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries that something clearly global happened on Earth, affecting all spheres of life. Suddenly, a technological leap occurred.

Almost all areas of human activity have received an impetus for development. Including painting, thanks to which we are now discussing this issue. After all, it was the appearance of the camera obscura that led to the emergence of photographically accurate recording of images.

Yes, and the modern calendar was imposed on us by the Caucasians in 7208 from the present day, which, by a strange coincidence, is the very same 1700.

An advanced civilization always leaves many traces smaller than airfields and skyscrapers. This:

Burials,
- garbage dumps,
- roads,
- places of extraction of minerals and building materials,
- tools and equipment,
- places of production of renewable resources necessary for the life of a huge mass of people, such as water, food, clothing and shoes.

And that's the minimum. From everything listed, we can hardly scrape together several quarries, quarries and mines, the age of which cannot be reliably determined. A striking example is the granite quarry in Aswan, which Egyptologists “designated” as the site for the extraction of building material for the construction of the great pyramids in Giza, which is located almost a thousand kilometers from the quarry. And the fact that the quarry was already being developed during the construction of the Aswan hydroelectric power station is not considered at all.

And even a “defective” stele in a quarry is considered “greetings” from the ancient Egyptians, although in fact, Russian engineers tried to cut it out by order of the USSR government, using a then-secret plasma torch.

The stele was planned to be installed on the square in front of Bolshoi Theater in Moscow, but after it cracked and became unusable, it became clear that using this method it was impossible to repeat what had been done BEFORE US. And the Moscow City Planning Council immediately recognized the stele as not corresponding to a single architectural style Theater Square Ensemble.

It turns out that man appeared on the planet simultaneously with ready-made megalithic structures, knowledge, and tools for further development technologies.

After all, whatever one may say, in order to extract iron ore, you need a pick and a shovel, in order to forge a knife from primitive iron, you need a hammer and an anvil, which, as you know, cannot be made without another hammer and anvil. It turns out to be a vicious circle, a fairy tale about a white bull, or a debate about what came first, the chicken or the egg.

And this paradox cannot be resolved by known methods. To find a solution, we will have to put forward a wild, anti-scientific version again. Here she is:

Our world was created immediately as it is. Someone created man, but immediately realized that in this form he would not exist at all. Unlike animals, humans do not have any means of survival in this world. Without clothes, shoes, housing, tools and weapons. He's just a naked little lump minced meat on the bones. Ideal food for animals. Therefore, it is obvious that having settled this gentle creature, unadapted to life on Earth, in the middle of rocks, forests and rivers, the creator was obliged to teach a person to survive and provide him with a minimum set of knowledge and skills.

75.

In addition, like any normal God, he had to provide a person with housing! Even a careless owner, before bringing a puppy into the yard, will build a kennel for him.

When you buy a hamster or a squirrel, you simultaneously buy a whole plastic town for your pets, and then watch with emotion how the hamster runs between the houses, drinks from the fountain, climbs the ladders to different floors of the houses... Doesn’t that remind you of anything? Isn’t this how livestock breeders behave in the ruins of Yuri Robertovich’s paintings?

77.

I understand that the comparison is crude, even cynical, but this is only to make it easier to understand the main idea of the proposed version. And the version was born thanks to the works of artists - ruinists, among others. These pictures clearly demonstrate the likelihood that I am right about something.

Ruins can actually speak, you just need to learn to understand their language. And one of the translation options I suggested:

The Creator created us at the same time as housing. How we disposed of it is the tenth thing. This is a feature of Homo sapiens that distinguishes it from other species - to destroy, break, and kill. The following conclusion follows from this. We were created the same way we create dog breeds. Some for hunting, others for protection, others for dog fighting, and others for home decoration.

80.

81.

Roughly, we are divided into two main types. On aggressors and defenders. But these two species are divided into subspecies, of course. And if so, then try to determine “which of xy” yourself. It turns out that the Slavs were created exclusively for one purpose - to repel attacks from outside on their land. There is something in it that is very necessary for those who created the Anglo-Saxons, who with manic persistence from century to century strive to take the place of the Slavs.

84.

This means that we are only an “application”, a mechanism for protecting something very important. We were created to protect the territory on which... Something material is not necessarily stored. Perhaps we are protecting something that is impossible to touch, but which is certainly very valuable. And it may very well be that this is the very “Russian spirit”.

87.

This is what the ruins whispered about. I don’t pretend to be an accurate translation, I don’t say anything for sure, but you can’t stop thoughts from being born. They can only be stated. For better or worse, time will tell.

In the picture: Jean-Christophe Miville “Ruins on the Seashore”.

“...Then they scare you with plates, they say, they’re vile, they fly,

Either your dogs are barking, or your ruins are talking.”

V.S.Vysotsky

Sometimes, it is still useful to forget all the knowledge acquired at school and college in order to take a fresh look at simple, long-known things. And then, something new will certainly open up. I invite you to reflect on my collection of reproductions of paintings by painters of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.

To begin with, a short preface. So that the course of my thoughts would be clear, and they themselves would not seem so incredible.

Every morally and physically healthy person sooner or later comes to the realization that all life is a continuous run in a circle. Well, or a zebra, as you like. Nevertheless, the essence is the same: One day you wake up in the morning and realize that you have spent a lot of vital energy pouring from empty to empty. You start to do everything anew, taking into account previous experience, and in the end, another morning comes when you have to rethink everything once again.

And it turns out that many people are unable to admit that what they considered unshakable is actually a delusion or a lie. We were taught perseverance, right? We are convinced that there must be some truths that must remain the basis of everything, without the existence of which chaos will begin. Therefore, a person who renounces his beliefs does not command anyone’s respect. The “steadfast tin soldiers” are respected. And in this the main problem. It is very difficult to grasp that fine line between truth and error.

And time flows... And everything around is changing rapidly. You cannot stupidly follow outdated instructions. But at the same time, one cannot deviate from moral norms, otherwise a “spin into a tailspin” is inevitable, which leads to disaster. The Bible describes the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and this is precisely about those who decided that moral standards were outdated and not mandatory. I hope to live to see the times when the new, current sodomite lands will receive what they deserve, in order to be convinced that at least these truths are truly unshakable. Otherwise, we will have to admit that HELL exists, and that is where we are.

So, let’s try to deviate from dogma, but at the same time, not cross the line and not slide into mysticism. Here are some striking paintings by various artists who are less famous than the works of Giovanni Battista Piranesi, but which are united not only by their era, but also by their content.

Unknown artist of the second half of the 18th century.

Pierre Patel the Elder.

Francesco Guardi.

Antonio Canaletto.

Dresden. Antonio Canaletto.

Alessandro Magnasco.

Jacob Van Ruisdael.

Nicholas Peters Berchem.

This master (Nicolaes Pieterszoon Berchem) painted quite a lot of landscapes in which the main characters are undoubtedly ruins. I called him Nikolai Petrovich Medvedev, and this is not exactly a joke, as many understand.

Reasonable question: - “Are they in Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries? there are no undestroyed buildings left? There is a reasonable explanation for this from historians and art critics. The explanation is actually simple and logical, and to question it is real madness. At first glance, there really is no need to “fence the garden”; it’s just a cultural trend, fashion, or as it has now become fashionable for patriots to say: “the trend of the times.”

Yes. Fashion and style are subject to the tastes and moods, thoughts and feelings of millions. We all see this “monkeying” around us everywhere. As soon as some famous idiot appears on camera skiing, hundreds of thousands of idiots begin to sweep away ski equipment from store shelves, and secretly admit to each other that since childhood they have only dreamed of getting on skis, when... Well, you know the rest. What? Did you succumb to the epidemic yourself? Is it hard to fly with Siberian Cranes?

Okay, let's get back to our sheep. And also to bulls, sheep and goats, against the backdrop of “ancient” ruins. This is also a “trend”. The same as the shepherds and washerwomen in the landscapes of those years. Did this “current” affect Russia? Do not doubt. Although the memory of Russian ruins was carefully erased in the 19th and even in the 20th century, something still remained. I will show only two works that I have not shown before:

Kyiv Detinets. Unknown artist.

Tower-Ruin in Catherine Park of Tsarskoe Selo.

Now she looks like she should. Nice expensive Tajik European-quality renovation, gloss and glamor. But more recently it seemed to be in line with the European "trend" of the 18th century. Noteworthy is the pebble with a European date, but depicted in Russian numerals.

“Dead” means the number 1762.

To be honest, the reliability of this plate seems very doubtful to me. For many reasons. See for yourself.

But not surprising. The scale of the “cleansing” of the true history of Russia is such that it’s hard to imagine how all this could have been accomplished. After all, everything that we were able to learn about the pre-Romanov empire was gleaned from sources that were outside the “cleansing” zone, namely in Western universities and libraries.

This fact leaves no doubt about who exactly “cleared” history. Of course the winner. And this winner is clearly not one of our ancestors, otherwise we would be writing the history of the Anglo-Saxons, and not they for us. Although... This is not our method. We are not against the great ancient past European civilization, which, of course, was one hundred thousand miles of guilders better than our savage one.

Of course, I do not assume that hordes of Germans walked through forests and fields and bulldozed all the ancient buildings on the territory of Tartary. No. It was enough to spit on all this “junk” and not worry about preservation, that’s all. And written sources were destroyed in a similar way. And not only this way, but also deliberately, purposefully.

Both under Peter and Catherine, books, under the pretext of preservation, were taken from the peasants, and whole convoys were taken to Moscow and St. Petersburg, after which their trace was lost in the darkness. It is clear that the “Old Believer heresy” was simply burned.

The Bolsheviks did exactly this in the twenties with the archives of the Romanovs themselves. It’s not for nothing that they say: “Don’t spit in someone else’s well...”

Well, God is their judge. Let's look at the paintings of another bright representative of the “ruinistic” movement in European painting– Giovanni Paolo Pannini, or as I call him, Ivan Pavlovich Panov.

As you can see for yourself, main character creations - ancient ruins. Nothing new, only in the ruins there were no cattle with cattle, but “normal Europeans”. Middle class and know. But this does not change the essence. Some ruins still exist today in the form of restored structures, or outright remakes. But most of what surrounded people just recently has been irrevocably stolen and stolen for urgent economic needs.

These subjects are also united by the fact that the artist photographically captured reality, without thinking about the subsequent interpretation of their creations by descendants. And the descendants turned out to be ungrateful, they considered their great-great-great-grandfathers to be half-witted, dark, uneducated dreamers, inclined to exaggerate, embellish, and generally suck things up.

This is what all modern encyclopedias and reference books write about “ruinistic” painting: – “___ SUBMIT IN THIS PLACE THE NAME OF ANY OF THE ABOVE ARTISTS____ – known for pictorial fantasies, whose main motive is parks and real, and more often imaginary, “majestic ruins” ( as Diderot puts it), many sketches for which he made during his stay in Italy.”

And are we supposed to believe this? Because the authority said it? And if I don’t want to take his word for it, and seeing all this splendor, I can’t believe that the artist reproduced those buildings that have survived to this day with photographic accuracy, and those that are no longer there, he simply took from his head! Why is this happening all of a sudden!?

The truth is that the artists did not invent anything, they documented the world, and we see that in the 18th century, by historical standards - YESTERDAY - the civilization of European peasants, cattle breeders, controlled by a handful of those who had more expensive rags on their bodies, existed on the ruins of gigantic megalithic structures, which they themselves clearly did not build.

And the explanation of the lords is that in fact, it was their ancestors who built it, but then the “era of medieval obscurantism” began, which lasted a whole thousand years, and everyone forgot how to build such a miracle... And they also forgot what the pyramids were for. And since it’s not clear what to do with them, then you need to tear them to hell so that your eyes don’t become an eyesore. And then to go on a hike in Egypt and “discover” the pyramids again, only now Egyptian ones.

So it turns out that our Colosseum is just a theater, so you can still see it today, but we couldn’t come up with a purpose for the pyramid, so they dismantled it into sheds for sheep and goats.

It is not clear what the stele from Egypt is doing in the picture, which, according to the official version, was brought only in the 19th century.

I want to ask a simple question and get a simple and clear answer to it. EBIPTOLOGISTS AND ARTISTS, tell me, how could a man (Giovanni Paolo Pannini) depict an “imaginary” pyramid and stele in Rome if he died seven years before the “discovery” of the Egyptian pyramids and this stele?!!!

The pyramids depicted are unusual; they don’t build them like that anymore. The proportions are unusual, the ratio of the length of the base of the pyramid to its height is completely different than that of all currently known pyramids, be it Egyptian, even American, even Chinese, even European ones (Visoko, in Bosnia). What kind of “stone cypresses” are these? Why did you break it? And they are clearly not “tombs” of any kind. I doubt that they even had any cavities inside that could be used during operation. Then what is it? Well, not for the sake of the need for aesthetics, right? And the dimensions are somehow “Khrushchev-esque”...

Caspar David Friedrich.

What else attracts attention? Dimensions of ceilings and openings. For a normal, modern hobbit, which we all (no offense) are, these sizes seem indecent.

From a construction point of view, it is not rational, too expensive, too labor-intensive. From the user's point of view, it is pointless and wasteful. A dwelling with such “ventilation” is not relevant even in a Mediterranean climate. It cannot be warmed in winter, and in summer there is no escape from the scorching rays of the sun.

And if the explanation of radical climate change looks convincing, then all other questions remain unanswered.

There are two versions: either the builders were giants, or for them building such gigantic structures was like two fingers on the asphalt.

If they were giants, then where did their remains go? All reports about the finds of giant skeletons, and even fingers or teeth, turned out to be falsifications. There were no humanoids of unusual sizes on earth, except for a few unique ones. If they did exist, how did they manage to evacuate every single one of them without anyone forgetting their slippers or bra?

Huber Robert. Ancient temple, 1787.

Yes, we love to build something significant, bulky, affecting the psyche little man, like the building of Moscow State University in Moscow, or Fisht Arena in Sochi. But basically, we build ordinary cheburek houses and dormitories, called, by misunderstanding, “houses.”

But we have:

Schools and institutes for training,

Unified standards (and this is a whole network of scientific institutions), without which large-scale construction is impossible,

Mining, raw materials and energy industries,

Industrial production of building materials, tools, fixtures, machines, and equipment,

Developed transport and communications system,

Communication system,

Centralized financial and budgetary spheres,

Unified management system (centralized power).

In the absence of at least one of the listed conditions, large-scale construction is impossible. But even for their existence a system of collection, analysis, and accumulation of scientific knowledge is required.

It appears that we are faced with the impossible. With advanced knowledge. And this pushes one to fall into mysticism. Aliens arrived, shared technologies, or gods arrived and taught people... Etc.

I don't like both versions. I am not against the existence of other races, such as the Atlanteans, Hyperboreans and Lemurians, but I am not entirely sure that they existed in the same world, or dimension, with us. More precisely, I have doubts that we could interact with them physically. We already coexist with millions of life forms that actually surround us, but we do not intersect in any way, we do not see, we do not hear, we do not talk to them, i.e. generally “no hello”. (*- until we tune in to their frequency. Note)

Therefore, without discarding all other versions, we will leave the only real one: - Everything that is depicted in the paintings was built by our ancestors, only the level of their development was incommensurate even with our current one. We are wild monkeys to them. Capable, fast-learning, but still ordinary pets, like cats or dogs for us. Only much more useful. We know how to support ourselves, and even feed our owners. Cats don’t feed us or clothe us; on the contrary, we are their slaves, we feed them.

I would risk making a statement that someone might consider xenophobic, but that’s his problem. Just imagine the situation: tomorrow they will decide to punish Erdagan for betraying the ideals of Western democracy and buying into cheap Russian gas. There is an immediate color revolution in Turkey, a Kurdish uprising, an ISIS invasion, and the fire of war is blazing in the south of Europe, in comparison with which the events in Donbass will seem like the struggle of Nanai boys.

The real “hot” begins World War, as a result of which the world turns into ruins. The remaining hobbits, deprived of electricity, computers, phones, and flash drives with encyclopedias and manuals like “How to grow wheat” or “How to mine iron and forge a knife from it, with which you can kill yourself so as not to suffer,” begin to reinvent ways hunting without firearms. And everything, everything starts from scratch.

But at the same time, a tribe continues to live in Chukotka, which does not know anything about this war. They will continue to raise and eat deer as before. And that’s it... do you seriously believe that someday this tribe will develop to the level where airplanes, ships, and computers are needed? Yes, that's it! They have been eating deer for thousands of years and will continue to eat because they don’t need any of this! Not because they are stupid, they are just “aliens.” They feel SO good. They have different life values, and they know that happiness is not from stupid books and films, but from the Creator God! They are united in this world with this world, but we are not. We need to build something, but we don’t understand that by building one thing, we kill another.

I wonder what’s there on the right, on the mountain? Could it be the pedestal of the statue of the Colossus himself, after whom the COLOSSIUM - the Colosseum - is named?

And now again I propose to play with words. This time - KOL AXIS. “UM” doesn’t count. This ending is artificial, added to Latin when an incomprehensible foreign word was borrowed. There was KOLOS, and in the Latin manner - KOLOSSI (UM). What does the word KOL/KOLO mean in Russian? We know it is the center of rotation (WHEEL, BELL, COLOR-turn, etc.), but the same thing means AXLE!

Only if KOLO is a broader concept meaning circle, circle, then OS/AXIS is a specific pin. It turns out that the rye or wheat EAR had an extremely important meaning, and it is understandable, “Bread is the head of everything.” This means that the Colossus, whose statue was located next to the Colosseum, in the city that is now called Rome, was clearly not the spirit of water or fire.

And.. This... Don’t send me to the library to read smart books there. Everything was re-read many times and many years ago. If you don't understand, read the Preface.

In general, “Colossus” is not just “big” or “giant”. This is a specific hero who was assigned a special role associated with the harvest, well-being, prosperity and prosperity. And let the skeptics laugh, but everything in this “Foreign European antiquity” is simply permeated with the common roots of a single proto-language, to which Slavic languages, closest to all the others.

What is happening to monuments in Ukraine now? Yeah... That’s exactly what happened with the statues that were disliked by the “enlightened victors.” Any object, even somehow connected with a single history uniting Europeans with the “vatniks”, is destroyed in the bud. Nothing changes... There were at least five statues of the Colossus (Athens, Rhodes, Thebes, and two in Rome, one of which, the main one, stood next to the Colosseum), where is at least one?

Logically, next to the pedestal on which the Colossus stood, there was more than one such lighthouse (in the distance to the left). Surely there were four of them, or at least two. The scale is truly colossal. This can be created either by a technomagical culture or by a powerful centralized state.

The first version is closer to me, because a powerful centralized state cannot help but leave in its memory a lot of rubbish, garbage, waste, and the remains of infrastructure. After all, hundreds of thousands of builders in our time would need entire cities for housing and supplies with everything they need. Workshops, shops, shops, farms, fields, and all this entails the need to have a developed network of roads.

Therefore, I am closer to the version that the builders, who could well have been our creators, had knowledge that seems to us like magic and mysticism, but in fact, these are completely rational technologies.

Here's a simple example. When in the “Taiga Dead End” in the eighties of the last century they discovered a family of hermits - Old Believers who had no contact with the outside world for more than fifty years continuously, then some things that were simple for us seemed like witchcraft to people. An ordinary plastic bag caused a real sensation. Glass, but it wrinkles!

So it is in this case. We have not the slightest reason to consider everything incomprehensible as mysticism. Technomagic is a simple process, the same as taking a fish out of the refrigerator to feed your beloved cat. The cat doesn’t know that you store the fish in the refrigerator, and do not materialize it through magical manipulations. How can I explain to him where the fish comes from? Moreover, what is a refrigerator?

In general, the builders of these structures can be conditionally considered Gods, because the level of their development was so much higher than the level of cattle breeders, by how much different level at modern man, born in a developed country, and the level of a savage living in the wilds of the Amazon. For him, even a can of lemonade seems like magic, not to mention a smartphone, a laser show, an airplane or a submarine.

If we disappear, the savage will use the inherited items for some time. He, of course, will use a knife in the same way as we do, but at best he will use a microwave oven for storing dishes or other useful household items. When all this disappears, the savage will most likely begin again, out of habit, tying sharp pieces of obsidian to a stick.

But it may also be the other way around: this advanced knowledge, in the form of objects that his people did not create, will give an impetus to development, and in two hundred years hovercraft will begin to fly in the Amazon jungle.

Most likely, the second scenario happened to us.

We inherited from the Gods accurate knowledge about the planets, stars, and the calendar. In addition, we received a solid supply of tools that allowed us to develop our own production. True, part of the knowledge was lost irretrievably. It seems we haven't even figured out how to use the bronze cannons. They began to shove gunpowder and cannonballs into them, ignite the gunpowder to fire a shot, but no one knows how these “copper pipes” were used before us.

We received fragmentary memories of some technological processes, the essence of which was not clear to us, but the outer side of which we copied thoughtlessly, although reliably. These are religious rituals.

Prayer in front of an icon is very similar to communicating on Skype, right? And I understand the nature of this phenomenon. When I start sharpening a knife in the kitchen, all the living creatures come running, both cats and dogs. They are confident that if “God rattles his magic wand on a magic crystal,” then soon scraps of meat, chicken, or even sausage will materialize out of thin air! And maybe, when the animals become even more intelligent, they will try to repeat the “rite with the rod and crystal.” They will begin to rub against each other, with the conviction that if you firmly believe, then food will appear in the same way as it appeared to the “god” - the owner.

So our “owners” have gone somewhere, left us, and we still look at the sky with hope, mutter all sorts of nonsense in churches, and believe that it is about to happen. You don’t have to believe, you have to know. Faith should be a personal category, let the wife believe her husband that he was fishing, and not in a bathhouse with girls. We need to discard all religious garbage, which is not much different from scientific garbage. And change the criteria of scientificity. Let's not forget that quite recently it was unscientific to claim that it is possible to build a ship from iron, a heavier-than-air aircraft, a machine gun for automatic firing under water, and much more.

What was considered unscientific yesterday is in every person’s pocket today. Actually, the pockets themselves are also anti-scientific. What would they have told you two hundred years ago if you had started asserting in polite society that clothes would be made from a liquid (oil)?

In general, everything is relative, and if the “matryoshka law” has been learned since childhood, then there is nothing complicated here. For example, to my then-future wife, I seemed like a god when I was in the flight mechanic’s seat of the Mi-8 helicopter. She was horrified by what she saw in the cockpit while the engines were starting. And to me, in turn, to this day my commander Nikolai Besvesilny, who flew even better than God, seems like God. I can’t understand how you can land a heavy vehicle blindly, in dense fog, on an area where there are only two to three meters from the tips of the blades to the trees and wires on concrete pillars. But he did it, and not only that.

And now we can speculate about the state of the ruins. We don't see any traces of bombing, that's a fact. The destruction that exists is more like natural destruction that occurred due to natural causes. The main thing is age. This happens when housing and communal services stops functioning, everything quickly falls into disrepair, in the absence of proper repairs and measures are taken to extend the service life.

Some were damaged by earthquakes, some more severely, some not so much, but functioning fountains and pools are adjacent to structures with traces of colossal erosion, which indicates the advanced age of the buildings. How old? This is one of the main questions.

But in my opinion, this may not be true either. You need to understand what these structures were built from before they turned into ruins. And this is a very important question. So, this stone is not really a stone. This is travertine, which is essentially a local variety of simple limestone. The Izborsk fortress was built from material with similar properties, and in three hundred years without repair it turned into not only ruins, but irregularly shaped hills!

Therefore, everything suggests that this beauty was built about a hundred years before it was “photographed.” And it’s not surprising why it happened that most of the ruins were stolen by livestock breeders into sheds and barns. The disaster occurred around 1700 according to traditional chronology. This is not pointing a finger at the sky. The year 1700 is very mysterious. Not for one year, of course, but it was at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries that something clearly global happened on Earth, affecting all spheres of life. Suddenly, a technological leap occurred.

Yes, and the modern calendar was imposed on us by the Caucasians in 7208 from the present day, which, by a strange coincidence, is the very same 1700.

Many will rightly object, they say, what difference does it make, let the Italians console themselves with the thought that it was their great ancestors who built all this splendor. Moreover, the version of traditional history does not give rise to so many contradictions. The only question that requires correction is that it came from nowhere, a thousand years, which clearly did not actually exist. This is practically beyond doubt.

But remember, ten years ago, even the mention of a non-existent, fictitious thousand years of the “Dark Middle Ages” could put an end to a scientist’s career. Now the shock stage has passed, and well-recognized doctors and academicians calmly argue that yes, it is quite acceptable. Well, what can you do, Petavius and Scaliger deceived everyone. Happens…

Yes, you can argue at your leisure about whether Chapaev was a man of the plow, or whether he was a sophisticated technocrat; this argument will not be able to change anything. But it’s a completely different matter if we have before our eyes evidence that can provide answers to the most important, fundamental questions for humanity. The most important for the entire existence of planet Earth:

Where are we from?

Who created us?

What is our goal?

How will it all end, when, and how?

Why did I decide that such answers could be obtained thanks to some pictures? Yes, because these may not be “some kind of pictures.” We have very little reason not to trust the veracity of a whole galaxy of artists, and if so, then this is exactly the case when we as a whole should seize this chance, given to us by our great-great-great grandfathers, and try to find out the true story humanity.

The most important argument is unconditional, one hundred percent proof of the presence of advanced knowledge in humans. This is a sign of the artificiality of the whole world that surrounds us. This is a sign that we ourselves are all artificial creations, biorobots. Assembled on a single platform from various spare parts.

In fact, it is really not so important whether the “ancient” structures were built in 1700, or in 700. The main contradiction here is different. I will formulate the most important question this way: If all the objects on Earth that we cannot, for one reason or another, recognize as the creation of the hands of our civilization, were built by a previous civilization, then where are the traces of the life activity of these hypothetical previous civilizations?

An advanced civilization always leaves many traces smaller than airfields and skyscrapers. This:

Burials,

Garbage dumps,

Places of extraction of minerals and building materials,

Tools and equipment,

Places of production of renewable resources necessary for the life of a huge mass of people are water, food, clothing and shoes.

They planned to install the stele on the square in front of the Bolshoi Theater in Moscow, but after it cracked and became unusable, it became clear that using this method to repeat what was done BEFORE US was impossible. And the Moscow City Planning Council immediately recognized the stele as not corresponding to the unified architectural style of the Theater Square ensemble.

It turns out that man appeared on the planet simultaneously with ready-made megalithic structures, knowledge, and tools for the further development of technology.

And this paradox cannot be resolved by known methods. To find a solution, we will have to put forward a wild, anti-scientific version again. Here she is:

Our world was created immediately as it is. Someone created man, but immediately realized that in this form he would not exist at all. Unlike animals, humans do not have any means of survival in this world. Without clothes, shoes, housing, tools and weapons. He's just a naked, warm lump of minced meat on bones. Ideal food for animals. Therefore, it is obvious that having settled this gentle creature, unadapted to life on Earth, in the middle of rocks, forests and rivers, the creator was obliged to teach a person to survive and provide him with a minimum set of knowledge and skills.

In addition, like any normal God, he had to provide a person with housing! Even a careless owner, before bringing a puppy into the yard, will build a kennel for him.

I understand that the comparison is crude, even cynical, but this is only to make it easier to understand the main idea of the proposed version. And the version was born thanks to the works of artists - ruinists, among others. These pictures clearly demonstrate the likelihood that I am right about something.

Ruins can actually speak, you just need to learn to understand their language. And one of the translation options I suggested:

This means that we are only an “application”, a mechanism for protecting something very important. We were created to protect the territory on which... Something material is not necessarily stored. Perhaps we are protecting something that is impossible to touch, but which is certainly very valuable. And it may very well be that this is the very “Russian spirit”.

Jean-Christophe Miville "Ruins on the seashore." “...They scare you with saucers, they say, they are vile, they fly, Then your dogs bark, then you say ruins.” V.S. Vysotsky Sometimes, it is still useful to forget all the knowledge acquired at school and college in order to take a fresh look at simple, long-known things. And then, something new will certainly open up. I invite you to reflect on my collection of reproductions of paintings by painters of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.

To begin with, a short preface. So that the course of my thoughts would be clear, and they themselves would not seem so incredible.

And it turns out that many people are unable to admit that what they considered unshakable is actually a delusion or a lie. We were taught perseverance, right? We are convinced that there must be some truths that must remain the basis of everything, without the existence of which chaos will begin. Therefore, a person who renounces his beliefs does not command anyone’s respect. The “steadfast tin soldiers” are respected. And this is the main problem. It is very difficult to grasp that fine line between truth and error.

Unknown artist of the second half of the 18th century.

Pierre Patel the Elder.

Francesco Guardi.

Antonio Canaletto.

Dresden. Antonio Canaletto.

Alessandro Magnasco.

Jacob Van Ruisdael.

Nicholas Peters Berchem.

A reasonable question: “What do they have in Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries?” there are no undestroyed buildings left? There is a reasonable explanation for this from historians and art critics. The explanation is actually simple and logical, and to question it is real madness. At first glance, indeed, there is no need to “fence the garden”, it’s just a cultural trend, fashion, or as it has now become fashionable to say among patriots: “the trend of the times.”

Kyiv Detinets. Unknown artist.

Tower-Ruin in Catherine Park of Tsarskoe Selo.

"Gone" means the number 1762.

To be honest, the reliability of this plate seems very doubtful to me. For many reasons. See for yourself.

This fact leaves no doubt about who exactly “cleared” history. Of course the winner. And this winner is clearly not one of our ancestors, otherwise we would be writing the history of the Anglo-Saxons, and not they for us. Although... This is not our method. We are not against the great past of ancient European civilization, which, of course, was one hundred thousand miles of guilders better than our savage one.

The Bolsheviks did exactly this in the twenties with the archives of the Romanovs themselves. It’s not for nothing that they say: “Don’t spit in someone else’s well...”

Well, God is their judge. Let's look at the paintings of another prominent representative of the “ruinistic” trend in European painting - Giovanni Paolo Pannini, or as I call him, Ivan Pavlovich Panov.

As you can see, the main character of the creations is ancient ruins. Nothing new, only in the ruins there were no cattle with cattle, but “normal Europeans”. Middle class and nobility. But this does not change the essence. Some ruins still exist today in the form of restored structures, or outright remakes. But most of what surrounded people just recently has been irrevocably stolen and stolen for urgent economic needs.

Here is what all modern encyclopedias and reference books write about “ruinistic” painting: - “___ SUBMIT IN THIS PLACE THE NAME OF ANY OF THE ABOVE ARTISTS____ - known for pictorial fantasies, whose main motive is parks and real, and more often imaginary, “majestic ruins” ( as Diderot puts it), many sketches for which he made during his stay in Italy.”

The truth is that the artists did not invent anything, they documented the world around them, and we see that in the 18th century, by historical standards - YESTERDAY - the civilization of European peasants and cattle breeders, controlled by a handful of those who had more expensive rags on their bodies, existed on the ruins of gigantic megalithic structures that they clearly did not build themselves.

So it turns out that our Colosseum is just a theater, so you can still see it today, but we couldn’t come up with a purpose for the pyramid, so they dismantled it into sheds for sheep and goats.

It is not clear what the stele from Egypt is doing in the picture, which, according to the official version, was brought only in the 19th century.

Caspar David Friedrich.

What else attracts attention? Dimensions of ceilings and openings. For a normal, modern hobbit, which we all (no offense) are, these sizes seem indecent.

And if the explanation of radical climate change looks convincing, then all other questions remain unanswered.

There are two versions: either the builders were giants, or for them building such gigantic structures was like two fingers on the asphalt.

Next will be reproductions of paintings by the great Hubert Robert (Hubert_Robert), in my opinion, Yuri Robertovich, who is considered a student of the great Piranesi.

Huber Robert. Ancient temple, 1787.

Yes, we love to build something significant, bulky, influencing the psyche of a small person, like the Moscow State University building in Moscow, or the Fisht Arena in Sochi. But basically, we build ordinary cheburek houses and dormitories, called, by misunderstanding, “houses.”

But we have:

Schools and institutes for training,

Unified standards (and this is a whole network of scientific institutions), without which large-scale construction is impossible,

Mining, raw materials and energy industries,

Industrial production of building materials, tools, devices, machines, and equipment, - a developed system of transport and communications,

Communication system,

Centralized financial and budgetary spheres,

Unified management system (centralized power).

It appears that we are faced with the impossible. With advanced knowledge. And this pushes one to fall into mysticism. Aliens arrived, shared technologies, or gods arrived and taught people... Etc.

I would risk making a statement that someone might consider xenophobic, but that’s his problem. Just imagine the situation: - tomorrow they will decide to punish Erdagan for betraying the ideals of Western democracy and buying into cheap Russian gas. There is an immediate color revolution in Turkey, a Kurdish uprising, an ISIS invasion, and the fire of war is blazing in the south of Europe, in comparison with which the events in Donbass will seem like the struggle of Nanai boys.

A real “hot” world war begins, as a result of which the world turns into ruins. The remaining hobbits, deprived of electricity, computers, phones, and flash drives with encyclopedias and manuals like “How to grow wheat” or “How to mine iron and forge a knife from it, with which you can kill yourself so as not to suffer,” begin to reinvent ways hunting without firearms. And everything, everything starts from scratch.

I wonder what’s there on the right, on the mountain? Isn't it the pedestal of the statue of the Colossus himself, after whom the COLOSSIUM - the Colosseum - is named?

And.. This... Don’t send me to the library to read smart books there. Everything was re-read many times and many years ago. If you don't understand, read the Preface.

In general, the builders of these structures can be considered Gods, because the level of their development was so much higher than the level of cattle breeders, just as the level of a modern person born in a developed country and the level of a savage living in the wilds of the Amazon are different. For him, even a can of lemonade seems like magic, not to mention a smartphone, a laser show, an airplane or a submarine.

Most likely, the second scenario happened to us.

Yes, and the modern calendar was imposed on us by the Caucasians in 7208 from the present day, which, by a strange coincidence, is the very same 1700.

But remember, ten years ago, even the mention of a non-existent, fictitious thousand years of the “Dark Middle Ages” could put an end to a scientist’s career. Now the shock stage has passed, and well-recognized doctors and academicians calmly argue that yes, it is quite acceptable. Well, what can you do, Petavius and Scaliger deceived everyone. Happens…

Where are we from?

Who created us?

What is our goal?

How will it all end, when, and how?

The most important argument is unconditional, one hundred percent proof of the presence of advanced knowledge in humans. This is a sign

artificiality of the whole world that surrounds us. This is a sign that we ourselves are all artificial creations, biorobots. Assembled on a single platform from various spare parts.

An advanced civilization always leaves many traces smaller than airfields and skyscrapers. This:

Burials,

Garbage dumps,

Places of extraction of minerals and building materials,

Tools and equipment,

Places of production of renewable resources necessary for the life of a huge mass of people are water, food, clothing and shoes.

It turns out that man appeared on the planet simultaneously with ready-made megalithic structures, knowledge, and tools for the further development of technology.

And this paradox cannot be resolved by known methods. To find a solution, we will have to put forward a wild, anti-scientific version again. Here she is:

Our world was created immediately as it is. Someone created man, but immediately realized that in this form he would not exist at all. Unlike animals, humans do not have any means of survival in this world. Without clothes, shoes, housing, tools and weapons. He's just a naked, warm lump of minced meat on bones. Ideal food for animals. Therefore, it is obvious that having settled this gentle creature, unadapted to life on Earth, in the middle of rocks, forests and rivers, the creator was obliged to teach man to survive and provide him with a minimum set of knowledge and skills

In addition, like any normal God, he had to provide a person with housing! Even a careless owner, before bringing a puppy into the yard, will build a kennel for him.

Ruins can actually speak, you just need to learn to understand their language. And one of the translation options I suggested:

Makeup. Skin and hair care. Manicure

RELATED ARTICLES