Annex 1

Comparative characteristics of Oblomov and Stolz

	Ilya Ilyich Oblomov	Andrey Ivanovich Stolts
age
portrait	“a man of average height, pleasant appearance, softness reigned in his face, his soul shone openly and clearly in his eyes”, “flabby beyond his years”	“all made up of bones, muscles and nerves, like a blooded English horse”, thin, “even complexion”, expressive eyes
parents		“Stolz is only half German, according to his father: his mother was Russian”
upbringing	The upbringing was of a patriarchal nature, moving “from hugs to hugs of relatives and friends.”	My father raised me harshly, teaching me to work, “my mother didn’t quite like this laborious, practical upbringing.”
Attitude to study	He studied “out of necessity”, “serious reading tired him”, “but the poets touched... a nerve”	“he studied well, and his father made him an assistant at his boarding school”
Further education	Spent up to 20 years in Oblomovka	Stolz graduated from university
Lifestyle	“Ilya Ilyich’s lying down was a normal state”	“he is involved in some company that ships goods abroad”, “he is constantly on the move”
Housekeeping	Didn’t do business in the village, received little income and lived on credit	“lived on a budget”, constantly monitoring my expenses
Life aspirations	“prepared for the field”, thought about his role in society, about family happiness, then he excluded social activities from his dreams, his ideal became a carefree life in unity with nature, family, friends	Having chosen an active beginning in his youth, he did not change his desires, “work is the image, content, element and purpose of life”
Views on society	All “members of society are dead, sleeping people”; they are characterized by insincerity, envy, and the desire to “get a high-profile rank” by any means necessary.	Immersed in the life of society, a supporter of professional activities in which he is engaged himself, supports progressive changes in society
Relation to Olga	I wanted to see a loving woman capable of creating a serene family life	Fosters an active principle in her, the ability to fight, develops her mind
relationships	He considered Stolz his only friend, capable of understanding and helping, and listened to his advice	highly appreciated moral qualities Oblomov, his “honest, faithful heart,” loved him “firmly and passionately,” saved him from the swindler Tarantiev, wanted to revive him to an active life
self-esteem	Constantly doubted himself, this showed his dual nature	Confident in his feelings, deeds and actions, which he subordinated to cold calculation
Character traits	Inactive, dreamy, sloppy, indecisive, lazy, apathetic, not devoid of subtle emotional experiences Oblomov And Stolz. Problem tasks Group Be able to compose comparative characteristics Oblomov And Stolz. ... Frontal, group Be able to compose comparative characteristics Oblomov and Olga, identify... Thematic planning of literature lessons in 10th grade Lesson Friend? Meeting with Stoltz. What is the difference between upbringing Oblomov And Stolz? Why love for Olga... days?) 18, 19 5-6 Oblomov and Stolz. Planning comparative characteristics Oblomov And Stolz, conversation according to the plan... Order No. of 2012 “Agreed” Deputy Director for Education and Science. N. Ischuk Working programm Cheat. chapters of the novel. Comparative characteristic Oblomov And Stolz 22 The theme of love in the novel... Oblomov” Ind. given " Comparative characteristic Ilyinskaya and Pshenitsyna" 23 ... Question 10 p. 307. Comparative characteristic A. Bolkonsky and P. Bezukhov... Calendar thematic planning 1st grade textbook by Yu. V. Lebedev 3 hours a week. Total 102 hours Lesson Image Oblomov, the formation of his character, lifestyle, ideals. Be able to compose characteristics... until the end 52 Oblomov and Stolz. Comparative characteristic To make a plan comparative characteristics Oblomov And Stolz. Be able to express your thoughts...

Oblomov and Stolz

Stolz is the antipode of Oblomov (The principle of antithesis)

The entire figurative system of I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” is aimed at revealing the character and essence of the main character. Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is a bored gentleman lying on the sofa, dreaming of transformations and a happy life with his family, but doing nothing to make his dreams come true. The antipode of Oblomov in the novel is the image of Stolz. Andrei Ivanovich Stolts is one of the main characters, a friend of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, the son of Ivan Bogdanovich Stolts, a Russified German who manages an estate in the village of Verkhlev, which is five miles from Oblomovka. In the first two chapters of the second part there is detailed story about the life of Stolz, about the conditions in which his active character was formed.

1. General features:

a) age (“Stolz is the same age as Oblomov and is already over thirty”);

b) religion;

c) training at the boarding house of Ivan Stolz in Verchlöw;

d) service and quick retirement;

e) love for Olga Ilyinskaya;

f) kind attitude towards each other.

2. Various features:

A ) portrait;

Oblomov . “He was a man about thirty-two or three years old, of average height, pleasant appearance, with dark gray eyes, but with absence of any definite idea, any concentration in facial features.”

«… flabby beyond his years: from lack of movement or air. In general, his body, judging by its matte finish, too white neck, small plump arms, soft shoulders, seemed too effeminate for a man. His movements, even when he was alarmed, were also restrained softness and not devoid of a kind of graceful laziness.”

Stolz- the same age as Oblomov, he is already over thirty. The portrait of Sh. contrasts with the portrait of Oblomov: “He is all made up of bones, muscles and nerves, like a blooded English horse. He is thin, he has almost no cheeks at all, that is, bone and muscle, but no sign of fatty roundness...”

Getting to know portrait characteristic this hero, we understand that Stolz is a strong, energetic, purposeful person who is alien to daydreaming. But this almost ideal personality resembles a mechanism, not a living person, and this repels the reader.

b) parents, family;

Oblomov's parents are Russian; he grew up in a patriarchal family.

Stolz comes from the philistine class (his father left Germany, wandered around Switzerland and settled in Russia, becoming the manager of an estate). “Stolz was only half German, on his father’s side; his mother was Russian; He professed the Orthodox faith, his native speech was Russian...” The mother was afraid that Stolz, under the influence of his father, would become a rude burgher, but Stolz’s Russian entourage prevented him.

c) education;

Oblomov moved “from hugs to hugs of family and friends,” his upbringing was patriarchal in nature.

Ivan Bogdanovich raised his son strictly: “From the age of eight, he sat with his father at the geographical map, sorted through the warehouses of Herder, Wieland, biblical verses and summed up the illiterate accounts of peasants, townspeople and factory workers, and with his mother he read sacred history, learned Krylov’s fables and sorted through Telemachus’ warehouses.”

When Stolz grew up, his father began to take him to the field, to the market, and forced him to work. Then Stolz began sending his son to the city on errands, “and it never happened that he forgot something, changed it, overlooked it, or made a mistake.”

Upbringing, like education, was dual: dreaming that his son would grow up to be a “good bursh,” the father in every possible way encouraged boyish fights, without which the son could not do a day. If Andrei appeared without a lesson prepared “by heart,” Ivan Bogdanovich sent his son back to where he came from - and every time young Stlts returned with the lessons he had learned.

From his father he received a “hard-working, practical upbringing,” and his mother introduced him to beauty and tried to instill in little Andrei’s soul a love of art and beauty. His mother “seemed the ideal of a gentleman in her son,” and his father accustomed him to hard, not at all lordly, work.

d) attitude towards studying at a boarding house;

Oblomov studied “out of necessity”, “serious reading tired him”, “but the poets touched... a nerve”

Stolz always studied well and was interested in everything. And he was a tutor at his father's boarding school

e) further education;

Oblomov lived in Oblomovka until he was twenty, then graduated from the university.

Stolz graduated from the university with flying colors. Parting with his father, who was sending him from Verkhlev to St. Petersburg, Stolz. says that he will certainly follow his father’s advice and go to Ivan Bogdanovich’s old friend Reingold - but only when he, Stolz, has a four-story house, like Reingold. Such independence and independence, as well as self-confidence. - the basis of the character and worldview of the younger Stolz, which his father so ardently supports and which Oblomov so lacks.

f) lifestyle;

“Ilya Ilyich’s lying down was his normal state.”

Stolz has a thirst for activity

g) housekeeping;

Oblomov did not do business in the village, received little income and lived on credit.

Stolz serves successfully, resigns to do his own business; makes a house and money. He is a member of a trading company that ships goods abroad; as an agent of the company, Sh. travels to Belgium, England, and throughout Russia.

h) life aspirations;

In his youth, Oblomov “prepared for the field,” thought about his role in society, about family happiness, then he excluded social activities from his dreams, his ideal became a carefree life in unity with nature, family, and friends.

Stolz chose an active beginning in his youth... Stolz’s ideal of life is continuous and meaningful work, this is “the image, content, element and purpose of life.”

i) views on society;

Oblomov believes that all members of the world and society are “dead men, sleeping people”; they are characterized by insincerity, envy, the desire to “get a high-profile rank” by any means; he is not a supporter of progressive forms of farming.

According to Stolz, with the help of the establishment of “schools”, “piers”, “fairs”, “highways”, the old, patriarchal “detritus” should be turned into comfortable estates that generate income.

j) attitude towards Olga;

Oblomov wanted to see loving woman, capable of creating a serene family life.

Stolz marries Olga Ilyinskaya, and Goncharov tries to imagine their active alliance, full of work and beauty. ideal family, a true ideal that fails in Oblomov’s life: “we worked together, had lunch, went to the fields, played music< …>just as Oblomov dreamed... Only there was no drowsiness, no despondency, they spent their days without boredom and without apathy; there was no sluggish look, no words; their conversation never ended, it was often heated.”

k) relationship and mutual influence;

Oblomov considered Stoltz his only friend, capable of understanding and helping, he listened to his advice, but Stoltz failed to break Oblomovism.

Stolz highly appreciated the kindness and sincerity of the soul of his friend Oblomov. Stolz does everything to awaken Oblomov to activity. In friendship with Oblomov Stolz. also rose to the occasion: he replaced the rogue manager, destroyed the machinations of Tarantiev and Mukhoyarov, who deceived Oblomov into signing a false loan letter.

Oblomov is accustomed to living according to Stolz’s orders; in the smallest matters, he needs the advice of a friend. Without Stoltz, Ilya Ilyich cannot decide on anything, however, Oblomov is in no hurry to follow Stoltz’s advice: their concepts of life, work, and application of strength are too different.

After the death of Ilya Ilyich, a friend takes in Oblomov’s son, Andryusha, named after him.

m) self-esteem ;

Oblomov constantly doubted himself. Stolz never doubts himself.

m) character traits ;

Oblomov is inactive, dreamy, sloppy, indecisive, soft, lazy, apathetic, and not devoid of subtle emotional experiences.

Stolz is active, sharp, practical, neat, loves comfort, is open in spiritual manifestations, reason prevails over feeling. Stolz could control his feelings and was “afraid of every dream.” Happiness for him lay in consistency. According to Goncharov, he “knew the value of rare and expensive properties and spent them so sparingly that he was called an egoist, insensitive...”.

The meaning of the images of Oblomov and Stolz.

Goncharov reflected in Oblomov the typical features of the patriarchal nobility. Oblomov absorbed the contradictory features of the Russian national character.

Stolz in Goncharov’s novel was given the role of a person capable of breaking Oblomovism and reviving the hero. According to critics, the unclear idea of ​​Goncharov about the role of “new people” in society led to the unconvincing image of Stolz. According to Goncharov, Stolz is a new type of Russian progressive figure. However, he does not depict the hero in a specific activity. The author only informs the reader about what Stolz has been and what he has achieved. By showing Stolz's Parisian life with Olga, Goncharov wants to reveal the breadth of his views, but in fact reduces the hero

So, the image of Stolz in the novel not only clarifies the image of Oblomov, but is also interesting to readers for its originality and complete opposite to the main character. Dobrolyubov says about him: “He is not the person who will be able, in a language understandable to the Russian soul, to tell us this almighty word “forward!” Dobrolyubov, like all revolutionary democrats, saw the ideal of a “man of action” in serving the people, in the revolutionary struggle. Stolz is far from this ideal. However, next to Oblomov and Oblomovism, Stolz was still a progressive phenomenon.

1. Childhood impressions and personality traits.
2. Central ideas in worldviews.
3. Debunking myths.

In the novel “Oblomov” A. A. Goncharov created images of two people, each of whom is in many ways typical representative a certain circle of people, an exponent of ideas that were close to the corresponding strata of their contemporary society. Andrei Stolts and Ilya Oblomov, at first glance, seem to have nothing in common, except for memories of childhood games. And yet, no matter how these characters in Goncharov’s novel are assessed, it is impossible to deny that they are connected by sincere, selfless friendship. What's the matter? Do the dreamy lazy man Oblomov and the calculating businessman Stolz attach so much importance to the past so that it continues to unite them in the present, when their paths, in fact, diverged? After all, they both met many other people in their lives. But the old friendship, as is easy to see after reading the novel to the end, will survive even Oblomov’s early death: Stolz willingly takes upon himself the care of raising the son of his late friend.

Indeed, Oblomov and Stolz are strikingly different from each other in their lifestyles. In Stolz’s view, the essence of being lies in movement: “Labor is the image, content, element and goal of life, at least mine.” Oblomov, having not yet started any business, is already dreaming of peace, which he already has in abundance: “...Then, in honorable inactivity, enjoy a well-deserved rest...”.

For some time, Oblomov and Stolz were brought up together - in a school run by Andrei's father. But they came to this school, one might say, from different worlds: the undisturbed, once and forever established order of life in Oblomovka, similar to a long afternoon nap, and the active labor education of a German burgher, interspersed with lessons from the mother, who tried with all her might to instill in her son a love and interest in art. Little Oblomov’s tender parents were afraid to let him go further than his native porch, in case something happened to their beloved child: the child was used to living like this, giving up on alluring, but painfully troublesome adventures. Stolz’s mother, it should be noted, would willingly follow the example of Ilya’s parents; fortunately, Andrei’s father turned out to be a much more practical person and gave his son the opportunity to show independence: “What kind of child is he if he has never broken his own or another’s nose?”

Both Oblomov’s parents and Stolz’s parents, of course, had certain ideas about how the lives of their children should develop in the future. However, the main difference is that Oblomov was not taught to set goals and go towards them, but Stolz perceives this need naturally and sensibly - he knows how not only to make a choice, but also to diligently achieve results: “Above all else he put persistence in achieving goals : this was a sign of character in his eyes, and he never refused to respect people with this persistence, no matter how unimportant their goals were.”

It is also important to note how Oblomov and Stolz approach life in general. According to Oblomov’s own feeling, his existence is becoming more and more like a fruitless wandering in the forest thicket: not a path, not a ray of sun... “It’s as if someone stole and buried in his own soul the treasures brought to him as a gift by peace and life.” This is one of Oblomov’s main miscalculations - he subconsciously seeks to place responsibility, his failures, his inactivity on someone else: on Zakhar, for example, or on fate. And Stolz “attributed the cause of all suffering to himself, and did not hang it, like a caftan, on someone else’s nail,” therefore “he enjoyed joy, like a flower plucked along the way, until it withered in his hands, never finishing the cup to that drop of bitterness which lies at the end of all pleasure." However, all of the above does not yet shed light on the foundations of strong friendship between people so different in their habits and aspirations. Apparently, their sincere, warm attitude towards each other is rooted in the fact that both Stolz and Oblomov are inherently worthy people, endowed with many high spiritual qualities. It would seem that Stolz is a business man, he should strive to benefit from everything, but his attitude towards Oblomov is devoid of any calculations. He sincerely tries to extract his friend from the swamp of apathy and inactivity, since Stolz is sincerely convinced that the existence that Oblomov leads is slowly but surely destroying him. As a man of action, Stolz always takes an active part in Oblomov’s fate: he introduces his friend to Olga, he stops the machinations of Tarantiev and Ivan Matveyevich, he puts Oblomov’s estate in order, and finally, he takes in the son of his early deceased friend to raise him. Stolz strives to do everything to the best of his ability to change Oblomov’s life for the better. Of course, for this to happen, Ilya Ilyich’s nature would first have to be changed, but only God can do this. And it is not Stolz’s fault that most of his efforts were in vain.

We can say that in Stolz everything that sleeps in Oblomov has reached a high degree of development: his implementation in business, his sensitivity to art and beauty, his personality. This, like Andrei’s sincere, benevolent attitude, of course, finds a response in the soul of Ilya, who, despite his laziness, has not lost his spiritual nobility. Of course, we see that Ilya Ilyich is ready to trust everyone who surrounds him: the scoundrel Tarantiev, the crook Ivan Matveevich Pshenitsyn. At the same time, he trusts Andrei, his childhood friend, incomparably more - Stolz is truly worthy of this trust.

However, in literary criticism and the minds of many readers there are still myths regarding the positive and negative in the images of Oblomov and Stolz. The unambiguity of such myths leads to the fact that Stolz is often interpreted as negative hero, whose main interest lies in acquiring money, while Oblomov is almost proclaimed a national hero. If you read the novel carefully, it is easy to notice the flawed and unfair nature of this approach. The very fact of Stolz's friendship with Oblomov, the constant help that the supposedly heartless businessman tries to provide to his friend, should completely dispel the myth that Stolz is an anti-hero. At the same time, Oblomov’s kindness, “dovelike tenderness” and dreaminess, which, of course, evoke sympathy for this character, should not obscure from readers the unsightly aspects of his existence: the inability to organize himself, useless project-making and aimless apathy.

No matter how we feel about the heroes of Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov,” we must remember that the author created images of living people, whose characters, of course, contain various qualities, both worthy and those that may not seem so to us. And yet one should not turn a blind eye to the fact that it is Stolz, who is sometimes regarded as not a very noble person, who works, brings benefit to himself and others, while Oblomov is not only not satisfied with the life of the peasants who depend on him, but also for himself sometimes it's a burden.

It does not lose its relevance even today, being a brilliant socio-psychological work in Russian literature of the 19th century. In the book, the author touches on a number of eternal topics and questions, without giving clear answers, inviting the reader to independently find solutions to the described conflicts. One of the leading eternal themes in the novel is the theme of family, revealed through the example of the biography of the main characters of the work - Ilya Ilyich Oblomov and Andrei Ivanovich Stolts. According to the plot of the novel, Oblomov’s attitude towards family and parents, on the one hand, is similar, but on the other hand, it is radically different from Stolz’s attitude towards family. Andrei Ivanovich and Ilya Ilyich, although they come from the same social system, adopted different family values and received completely different upbringings, which later left an imprint on their fate and development in life.

Oblomov family

The reader encounters the description of the Oblomov family in the novel “Oblomov” in final chapter the first part of the work - “Oblomov’s Dream”.
Ilya Ilyich dreams of beautiful landscapes of his native Oblomovka, his calm childhood, parents and servants. The Oblomov family lived by its own norms and rules, and their main values ​​were the cult of food and relaxation. Every day, the whole family decided what dishes needed to be prepared, and after lunch the whole village plunged into sleepy, lazy idleness. In Oblomovka it was not customary to talk about something lofty, to argue, to discuss serious questions– conversations between family members were meaningless exchanges of words that did not require additional energy and emotions.

It was in such a calming and in its own way depressing atmosphere that Ilya Ilyich grew up. The hero was a very curious, interested in everything and an active child, but the excessive care of his parents and their attitude towards him as a greenhouse plant led to the fact that he was gradually swallowed up by the swamp of “Oblomovism”. Moreover, education, science, literacy and all-round development in Oblomov’s family were considered rather a whim, an excess, a fashionable trend, which one could easily do without. That is why, even after sending their son to study, Ilya Ilyich’s parents themselves found many reasons for him to skip classes, staying at home and indulging in idle pastime.

Despite the excessive guardianship on the part of Oblomov’s entourage, Oblomov’s attitude towards his family and parents was the most favorable, he actually loved them calm love, whom it was customary to love in Oblomovka. And even dreaming about how he would establish his family happiness, Ilya Ilyich imagined his future relationship with his wife exactly as it was between his father and mother - full of care and tranquility, representing the acceptance of his other half for who she is. Perhaps this is why the love of Oblomov and Olga was doomed to parting - Ilyinskaya only at first glance looked like the ideal of his dreams, but in fact she was not ready to devote her life to ordinary everyday joys, which for Ilya Ilyich represented the basis of family happiness.

Stolz family

Andrei Stolts in the novel is Oblomov’s best friend, whom they met back in school years. Andrei Ivanovich grew up in the family of a Russian noblewoman and a German burgher, which could not leave its mark on the already receptive, active and purposeful boy to the world around him. His mother taught Andrei the arts, instilled in him a wonderful taste for music, painting and literature, and dreamed of her son becoming a prominent socialite. The parents of Oblomov and Stolz knew each other, so Andrei was often sent to visit the Oblomovs, where that landowner calm and warmth always reigned, which were acceptable and understandable to his mother. His father raised Stolz to be the same practical and businesslike person as himself. He, undoubtedly, was the most important authority for Andrei, as evidenced by the moments when the young man could leave home for several days, but at the same time complete all the tasks assigned by his father.

It would seem that sensual maternal and rational paternal upbringing should have contributed to the formation of Stolz as a comprehensively developed, harmonious and happy personality. However, this did not happen due to the early death of his mother. Andrei, despite his strong-willed character, loved his mother very much, so her death became a real tragedy for the hero, complemented by an episode of forgiveness with his father, when he, sending him to St. Petersburg to live an independent life, could not even find words of encouragement for his own son . Perhaps this is why the attitude towards Oblomov’s and Stolz’s own family was different - Andrei Ivanovich rarely remembered his parents, unconsciously seeing the ideal of family life in “Oblomov’s”, spiritual relationships.

How did upbringing influence the characters’ future lives?

Despite their different upbringings, the attitude towards Oblomov and Stolz’s parents is more similar than different: both heroes respect and love their parents, strive to be like them and appreciate what they gave them. However, if for Andrei Ivanovich, upbringing became a springboard for achieving career heights, establishing himself in society and helped develop will and practicality, the ability to achieve any goals, then the “greenhouse” upbringing made Oblomov, who was already dreamy by nature, even more introverted and apathetic. Ilya Ilyich’s first failure in the service leads to his complete disappointment in his career, and he quickly replaces the need to work with continuous lying on the couch and pseudo-experience real life in dreams and unrealistic illusions about the possible future of Oblomovka. It is noteworthy that both heroes see the ideal future wife in a woman who looks like a mother: for Ilya Ilyich she becomes the economical, meek, quiet Agafya, who agrees with her husband in everything, while Stolz, having first seen in Olga an image similar to his mother, after years of his life understands that this is not entirely true , because he needs to constantly develop in order to remain an authority for his demanding, selfish wife.

The theme of family in “Oblomov” is one of the most important, so it is through understanding the peculiarities of the upbringing and development of the characters that the reader begins to understand their life goals and motives. Perhaps if Ilya Ilyich grew up in a family of progressive bourgeois or Stolz’s mother had not died so early, their fates would have turned out differently, but the author, accurately depicting the social realities of that time, leads the reader to eternal questions and themes.

By depicting two different types of personality in the novel, two opposite paths, Goncharov provided readers with a vast field for reflection on issues of family and education that are still relevant in our time.

The attitude of Stolz and Oblomov to family and parents - an essay based on the novel by Goncharov |

1 of 25

Presentation on the topic: Stolz and Oblomov

Slide no. 1

Slide description:

Slide no. 2

Slide description:

Slide no. 3

Slide description:

Main questions: - Why didn’t the author depict Oblomov’s miraculous transformation? - How can you generally help a person achieve harmony with life, learn not to hide, but to reveal to the world all his intellectual and spiritual wealth? What needs to be done to help a person overcome apathy and return to a full life? - What did Stolz intend to do in the name of saving his friend? What was his conclusion? - Why such noble spiritual impulses of Stolz did not lead to the expected result.

Slide no. 4

Slide description:

Was the author right in believing that it was a person like Stolz who was capable of saving Oblomov? - Could a person like Stolz awaken Oblomov’s soul? - What traits did the author endow with Andrei Stolts? Can we consider that the image of Stolz is strictly opposed to the image of Oblomov? Match author's description lifestyle of Oblomov and Stolz. 1. In what ways are Oblomov and Stolz opposed to each other? 2. What brings Oblomov and Stolz together?

Slide no. 5

Slide description:

“Oblomov, a nobleman by birth, a collegiate secretary by rank, has been living in St. Petersburg for twelve years without a break” (1, V). “Ilya Ilyich’s lying down was neither a necessity, like that of a sick person or like a person who wants to sleep, nor an accident, like that of someone who is tired, nor a pleasure, like that of a lazy person: it was his normal state” (1.1 ). “Stolz is the same age as Oblomov: and he is already over thirty years old... He is constantly on the move...” (2, II) “Stolz was only half German, according to his father; his mother was Russian; he professed the Orthodox faith; his natural speech was Russian..." (2.1) "He walked firmly, cheerfully; lived according to a budget, trying to spend every day, like every ruble, with every minute, never dozing control of the time spent, labor, strength of soul and heart. It seems that he controlled both sorrows and joys by the movement of his hands, the steps of his feet, or how he dealt with bad and good weather” (2, II).

Slide no. 6

Slide description:

“He kept getting ready and preparing to start life, he kept drawing a pattern of his future in his mind; but with every year that flashed over his head, he had to change and discard something in this pattern. Life in his eyes was divided into two halves: one consisted of work and boredom - these were synonyms for him; the other - from peace and peaceful fun” (1, V). “And he himself walked and walked stubbornly along the chosen path. We didn’t see him thinking about anything painfully and painfully; apparently, he was not consumed by the remorse of a weary heart; he was not sick in soul, he never got lost in complex, difficult or new circumstances, but approached them as if he were former acquaintances, as if he were living a second time, passing through familiar places” (2, II). 1. Oblomov has been living in the same city for more than 12 years, and his main occupation is lying down; Stolz is “constantly on the move.” Oblomov was still just getting ready and preparing to start life, Stolz “kept walking and walking stubbornly along his chosen path.” Oblomov was just creating in his imagination a picture of his future life; Stolz did everything thoughtfully and confidently, “as if he was living a second time.” 2. Oblomov and Stolz are peers, belong to the same social stratum.

Slide no. 7

Slide description:

Oblomov and Stolz: relationships with parents - Compare the nature of the relationship between Oblomov and Stolz with their parents. 1. In what ways are Oblomov and Stolz opposed to each other? (1, IX, 1, IX, 2,1) 2. What brings Oblomov and Stolz together? 1. Oblomov knew almost no male education; Stolz's father, on the contrary, sought to make a real man out of his son; he was a supporter of harsh methods of education and did not allow his wife to interfere with his communication with Andrei with pity and excessive care. 2. Both Oblomov and Stolz remember their mothers with tenderness, unable to hold back their tears. Their mothers - an example of tenderness and caring - treasured their sons, sought to protect them from danger, and could not stop looking at their children.

Slide no. 8

Slide description:

Oblomov and Stolz: attitude to the teaching - Compare information about the attitude to the teaching of Oblomov and Stolz. How are Oblomov and Stolz opposed to each other? (1, VI;2,1) 2. What brings Oblomov and Stolz together? 1. Oblomov studied against his will, not understanding why he was given this punishment and why he needed this knowledge in life; the parents sought to protect their son from difficult teaching. Stolz's education was supervised by his father, who gave him important assignments and asked him how to behave as an adult. Stolz was an excellent student. And soon he began teaching himself. 2. Both Oblomov and Stolz were created the necessary conditions for the study. They both received a good education, and long years studied together.

Slide no. 9

Slide description:

Oblomov and Stolz: attitude to service and to society. -Compare information about the attitude of Oblomov and Stolz to service and role in society. 1. In what ways are Oblomov and Stolz opposed to each other? (1, V; 2, II) 2. What brings Oblomov and Stolz together? 1. Oblomov was alien to the lifestyle that his service required of him, as well as the bustle and noise of social life; he had successfully isolated himself from them. Stolz felt confident both in the service and in society, but never attached much importance to it. There are no bummers in the world; Stolz, despite his busy schedule, manages to appear in secular society. 2. Neither Oblomov nor Stolz believed that the service or secular society have special meaning in their lives. Both Oblomov and Stolz are retired.

Slide no. 10

Slide description:

Oblomov and Stolz: understanding of love - Compare the nature of the experiences of lovers Oblomov and Stolz - How are Oblomov and Stolz opposed to each other? (2, X; ,XI; 3, VI; 4,IV; 4, VII). 1. For Oblomov, love is a shock, an illness, it causes him mental and physical suffering. For Stolz, love is a labor of mind and soul. 2.Both Oblomov and Stolz are gifted with the ability to love deeply, sincerely.

Slide no. 11

Slide description:

Conclusion. The author characterizes Stolz as a bright, attractive personality; If Oblomov is lazy, inactive, good-natured, good-natured, sensitive, capable of emotional impulse, indecisive, then Stolz is active, active, kind, benevolent, focused on his goal, immersed in thought, prudent, calculating, and quickly makes decisions. The images of Oblomov and Stolz are contrasted both in terms of upbringing, and in relation to teaching, and in the perception of love... However, it cannot be said that the basis for the comparison of these images is a strict opposition. The author presented the reader with two bright personalities, inner world which are not limited to mutually exclusive characteristics. He draws the reader's attention to the fact that these heroes are brought together by their deep affection for their mother, memories of childhood and youth, and the ability to deeply and sincerely love. It is obvious that Stolz is exactly the person who could awaken Oblomov’s soul.

Slide no. 12

Slide description:

Maybe Oblomov was afraid to trust Stolz? - What kind of relationship connected Oblomov and Stolz? Write down the words and phrases of the text with which the author characterizes the relationship between Oblomov and Stolz. (I,III; 2,II) Oblomov and Stolz were connected not only by common pages of biography. They valued each other, were always glad to meet, knew how to appreciate best qualities and be tolerant of each other's weaknesses. Their relationship is one of deep emotional affection, sincere heartfelt feelings. Oblomov and Stolz needed each other and were grateful to fate for sending them each other. Oblomov trusted Stolz, believed that he could help him, and expected help from him.

Slide no. 13

Slide description:

Maybe Stolz made a mistake in choosing the means to save his friend? - Did Stolz choose the right means to realize his plan? Stolz, it would seem, calculated everything correctly. Love is a feeling that causes the most powerful shocks. If there are still living feelings in a person’s soul, love will not allow them to doze. Stolz was sure that Olga would charm Oblomov. - Were Stolz’s expectations met? Oblomov and Olga: awakening of love