The hero of the novel, Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, is a young man not deprived positive qualities. He is kind, smart, simple-minded. Its main drawback is the inertia and indecision absorbed with mother's milk. His character is a direct consequence of his upbringing. From childhood, not accustomed to work, the spoiled boy did not know the joy of activity. An ideal life, in his understanding, is a carefree period of time between sleep and eating. Having matured, he does not see the point in work; it only brings him a feeling of annoyance. Under a ridiculous pretext, he resigns from his position.

The tragedy of the hero is that he is deprived of the urgent need to earn a piece of bread. The family estate brings him little real income. It, in fact, is the subject of his daily meaningless dreams.

The hero's inactivity is even more pronounced in contrast with his active friend Stolz, a hereditary German. They say about these that the wolf’s legs feed him. He gets his daily bread through painstaking work. At the same time, he reaps not only the difficulties, but, at the same time, the delights of an action-packed life.

In the novel, the author asks himself the question of what “Oblomovism” is? Is this the tragedy of the children of hereditary landowners, instilled in them from childhood or an original Russian character trait? Is it possible to break out of a vicious circle through an effort of will or to end a life that is meaningless for society without doing anything? What is the meaning of existence for someone affected by pathological laziness? And only a thinking reader will understand that the author is concerned about the future of the state against the background of the collective image of his character.

Having written his novel about an inert middle-class landowner, I. A. Goncharov introduced the term “Oblomovism” into the Russian language, on behalf of its main character. It means peacefully passive idleness, meaningless, idle pastime. Fear of going beyond the comfortable state of half-asleep.

Option 2

Ilya Oblomov is the main character in the novel “Oblomov” by I.A. Goncharova.

Oblomov is thirty-two to thirty-three years old. He had average height, small hands, a plump body and dark gray eyes. In general, he had a pleasant appearance.

Ilya is a hereditary nobleman. As a child, I was an active and energetic child, but my parents stopped this. He was not burdened with any problems. They didn’t let him do anything on his own; the servants even put on his socks. Oblomov is an educated person in law and legal proceedings. Now he is a retired official. He served in St. Petersburg, but he got tired of it, and Ilya left. Oblomov never had affairs with women. They started, but ended immediately. He had only one close friend - the complete opposite of Ilya - Andrei Stolts. Main character a thoughtful and melancholic person. He often thinks about something while lying on the sofa. He doesn’t finish anything: he studied English and gave up, he studied mathematics and also gave up. Considers studying to be a waste of time. Its development has long stopped.

Now Oblomov has his own estate, but he is not involved in it. Sometimes Stolz takes over and resolves some issues. Ilya often and carefully thinks about how he could improve it, but it doesn’t come to practice.

He doesn't like to go out into the world. Only his friend Andrey manages to get him out into the public eye. Also, only because of him Oblomov can read a couple of books, but without interest, lazily.

The main character is very concerned about his health and is afraid of getting sick. However, he spends most of his time at home in a lying position. His old servant, Zakhar, does all the work for him. Oblomov often overeats. He knows that this is harmful to the body, but he has done this all his life and is used to it. Doctors often examine him and advise him to completely change his lifestyle in order to feel better. But Ilya only uses this as an excuse to do nothing, claiming that he is sick.

Oblomov has a very kind heart and is able to help people. Later he will marry Agafya Pshenitsina and adopt her children, whom he will raise with his own money. She will not bring him anything new; she will only be an addition to his usual way of life. Sometimes Ilya thinks about himself like this, and his conscience torments him. He begins to envy other people who have an interesting and luxurious life. Everyone tries to blame someone for their lifestyle, but finds no one.

Essay about Oblomov

“He was a man about thirty-two or three years old, of average height, pleasant appearance, with dark gray eyes, but with the absence of any definite idea, any concentration in his facial features.” Thus, with a description of Oblomov, I.A.’s novel begins. Goncharova.

At first glance, Oblomov is apathetic, lazy and indifferent. He can lie on the bed for a long time and think about something of his own or be in his dream world. Oblomov doesn’t even notice the cobwebs on the walls or the dust on the mirrors. However, this is only the first impression.

The first visitor is Volkov. Oblomov didn’t even get out of bed. Volkov is a young man of twenty-five years old, dressed in the latest fashion, combed and in good health. Oblomov’s first reaction to Volkov was: “Don’t come, don’t come: you’re coming from the cold!” Despite all Volkov’s attempts to invite Oblomov to dinner or to Ekateringof, Ilya Ilyich refuses and remains at home, seeing no point in traveling.

After Volkov leaves, Oblomov turns over on his back and talks about Volkov, but his thoughts are interrupted by another call. This time Sudbinsky came to him. This time Ilya Ilyich's reaction was similar. Sudbinsky invites Oblomov to dinner with the Murashins, but even here Oblomov refuses.

The third guest was Penkin. “Still the same incorrigible, carefree sloth!” says Penkin. Oblomov and Penkin discuss the story, and Penkin asks Oblomov to read the story “The Love of a Bribe Taker for a Fallen Woman,” but a brief retelling makes Ilya Ilyich angry. After all, the story ridicules vice, contempt for fallen man, to which Oblomov reacts ambiguously. He understands that any thief or fallen woman is first and foremost a person.

However, Oblomov’s essence is fully revealed through love. Love for Olga Ilyinskaya inspires him. He reads, develops for her sake, Oblomov blossoms, dreams of a happy future together. But realizing that he is not ready to change completely, realizing that he cannot give Olga what she needs, realizing that he is not created for her, he retreats. He understands that he will not be able to find the long-awaited happiness with Ilyinskaya. But after a while, he develops a relationship with Pshenitsina, which will be built on love and respect.

The attitude towards Oblomov cannot be unambiguous. The character of the hero is multifaceted. On the one hand, he is lazy and passive, but on the other, he is smart, he understands human psychology, he knows how to love and is capable of much for the sake of love. In conclusion, we can say that all the qualities of a Russian person are collected in one character.

Option 4

The main character of the novel of the same name "Oblomov" A.I. Goncharova is about thirty-two or thirty-three years old. He is a young man, not without a pleasant appearance, and a fairly educated man, a hereditary nobleman. Oblomov Ilya Ilyich is kind, quite smart and childishly simple-minded.

However, everything positive features overshadowed by one negative one - pathological laziness settled in his thoughts and over time took over Oblomov’s entire body. Body young nobleman flabby, became loose and feminine - Ilya Ilyich does not bother himself with either mental or physical activity, preferring to lie on the couch almost all the time and dream about how to do nothing more. “As if everything would happen by itself!” - this is his life credo.

Having inherited an estate that provides a small but stable income, Oblomov does not improve anything in it and does not strive to ensure that his affairs prosper. Out of laziness, Ilya Ilyich threw all his worries regarding the estate onto the manager, who mercilessly and shamelessly robs him. Oblomov's servant Zakhar performs minor daily chores. And Ilya Ilyich himself prefers to lie on the sofa all day and daydream - a kind of “sofa dreamer”.

His dreams take him very far - in his dreams he would improve a lot on his estate, becoming even richer, but his dreams are meaningless. He doesn't even try to implement them. Dreams collide with his inertia and infantilism and are broken daily, turning into unrealistic, foggy dreams that end up settling on the sofa, enveloping Oblomov.

Why is there an estate - Oblomov is too lazy to even go on a visit. When he is invited to go on a visit, he avoids visits under far-fetched pretexts, remaining lying on his dear sofa. Oblomov does not like to go out - it is lazy and uninteresting to him.

Realizing that he was not developing spiritually and could not give anything to his chosen one except maintenance, Oblomov even abandoned his love for Olga Ilyinskaya. At first, Ilya Ilyich tried to change for the sake of Olga, he began to read a lot in order to achieve spiritual development her level, dreamed of a happy future with the woman he loved. But he was not ready to change completely even with love - Oblomov was stopped by fear of irreversible changes and he gave up his dream. He was completely satisfied with his current life as a couch potato and even such strong passions as love and passion for a woman did not motivate him to get up from his favorite sofa.

Oblomov was made so inert and inactive by his own parents, who from childhood instilled in their son that all important things should be done for him by others. They suppressed any manifestation of the boy’s activity, and gradually Ilya turned into a desperate sloth. This is how not only Ilya Ilyich Oblomov lived in those days - many of his offspring lived this way noble family. The author created a collective image of a sybarite of noble origin of that time and called this phenomenon “Oblomovism.” The writer was worried about the fate of Russia and he was afraid that such “Oblomovs” would rule it.

Several interesting essays

• Why is it important to be able to forgive? Final essay

  Everyone knows resentment, anger at the offender, disappointment. This is a burning from the inside, painful, poisonous feeling that poisons a good attitude towards a person. This emotion can most often be experienced towards a person

It was not in vain that nature divided people into men and women. As a result, we got two completely different creatures, differing both in logic and in principles and beliefs. However, these negative poles are created

• Essay Spiritual quest of the heroes of the novel War and Peace by Tolstoy

  “War and Peace” is an epic novel written by Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy in 1863. IN this work the author touched upon many problems, the relevance of which does not fade away after 150 years

• Essay Sons of Taras Bulba 7th grade

  The famous and even heroic story of the famous Russian writer Nikolai Gogol, Taras Bulba, is a unique work that tells about the famous and famous people - the Cossacks

He created many works where he deliberately evades specifics. In his novels, he did not like to describe people with specific character traits that were unique to them. He created his heroes, whose features could suit many ordinary people. So in 1859, Oblomov’s work appeared, where the author showed the society of the nobles and its condition in post-reform Russia. And now, after reading Goncharov’s work, I need to cover the topic of Oblomov and Oblomovism in an essay for the 10th grade.

Oblomov and Oblomovism essay

Starting work on the topic of Oblomov and Oblomovism, I want to highlight the main character - this is Ilya Ilyich Oblomov in person. He is a nobleman cultured person, educated, smart. As the author describes him, he is a 32-year-old man with a pleasant appearance, but there is no idea on his face and in his eyes. There is no life in it. He is immersed in some kind of abyss of sleep. This is a lazy character, and despite the fact that he initially contained the best character traits, the atmosphere in which he grew up and was brought up changed everything and began to change in Oblomov’s character. irreversible process. No friendship, no feelings could lift him from the couch, force him to act.

The hero is indifferent to the surrounding reality, he dreams and lives according to the principle, if only so. Oblomov constantly talked about how good it would be if this were done. But let everything be done on its own. Ilya Ilyich does not see himself as an accomplice in any case. And we find the reason for this behavior. Everything lies in childhood. We see that Oblomov grows up surrounded by servants. In his life, others did everything for him. And although the boy was initially inquisitive and lively, the atmosphere of the village of Oblomovka killed everything beautiful in him. And the fairy tales told by the nanny sowed the seeds of melancholy and fear. And then we get acquainted with “Oblomovism”.

What is Oblomovism?

As for me, this is a disease and an all-consuming disease. The concept of Oblomovism was raised more than once in the novel. The main symptom of the disease is laziness, inaction and fear of change.

Are there Oblomovism and Oblomovs among us today? No matter how sad it may sound, Oblomovism still exists today. This disease is simply ineradicable. People were afraid of change then, people are afraid of change today. They want to change something, but they want others to do it. We all love to shift things to someone else, wanting to be just observers of what is happening. Can't shift your responsibilities to someone else? Well, let everything be left to chance. This is how we live, like Oblomov. But you need to change everything, move forward, act, stumble in your endeavors, fall, rise and move on. This is the only way we can achieve more in life. And it is by this principle that I intend to live in the future. I really don’t want to be Oblomov and become infected with such a disease as Oblomovism.

Essay on the topic: Oblomov and “Oblomovism”

What rating will you give?

Essay on the topic: how I understand patriotism (essay-reflection on a current topic) Brief retelling the fourth part of Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov”

At the very beginning of I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov,” the author reveals the image of the main character, but not only his appearance, manners, habits, but also feelings and thoughts. One can even feel the very outcome of the novel after this description, the endlessly drawn-out introduction of readers into Oblomov’s life: one day of his existence alone takes up a quarter of the novel.

So who is this Ilya Ilyich Oblomov? A man of “pleasant appearance, with dark gray eyes, but with the absence of any definite idea.” Indeed, Oblomov had no idea, because... he didn't even bother to ask himself such a difficult task. He was just too lazy to invent anything. Although Oblomov could not help but think, he often tormented himself with problems: to go or not to go to Oblomovka, whether to meet Olga, even whether to start reading. But he was so weak-willed, careless and lazy that he usually simply could not solve these problems: “Rarely did this anxiety congeal in the form of a definite idea, and even more rarely did it turn into intention.” It all ended with him groaning, sighing, or simply falling asleep. All life flowed slowly, monotonously and boringly for him.

Guests visiting Oblomov, such as Volkov, Sudbinsky, Penkin, Alekseev, invite him for lunch, for the evening, or just to have fun. But they still couldn’t budge him - he didn’t even have his “dress ready.”

Another guest who often visited Oblomov was Mikhei Andreevich Tarantiev. Not for nothing, not just like that, he comes to have lunch with Oblomov, but for his own benefit, and later even steals a lot of money from him. This is a real swindler who only knows how to make money with the help of cunning inventions and invented tricks. Although he was very capable as a child, he did not have the opportunity to apply these abilities in his studies, but he remained a “theorist” throughout his life. “No one can judge any general everyday question or complicated legal matter better than him: he will now build a theory of action in this or that case and very subtly summarize the evidence.” It was this ability that he used to get rent from Oblomovka.

At first Oblomov treated Tarantyev well, even thought that he helped him, perhaps because Tarantyev believed that he was doing honor to everyone with his visit. But later, having learned about the meanness, Oblomov finally broke up with him and kicked him out. He himself realized that Tarantiev was a nonentity (but not without the influence of Stolz: they quarreled after his departure).

Why were Oblomov and Stolz such close friends? Perhaps not only because they grew up together, but because they were “so different from each other.” Stolz with his lively mind, thirst for action, striving for the fullness of life, and Oblomov with his laziness, “dovelike tenderness” and “pure soul.” Stolz understands Oblomov perfectly, knows that he needs to be stirred up, maybe even forced to force him to leave, change his lifestyle, the surrounding atmosphere. Stolz tries to do all this, but to no avail. Oblomov evades each time, finds excuses (says that he will arrive “later”). It seemed that everything was lost, there was no more chance.

But a sweet image of Olga appears. And feelings awaken in Oblomov’s sleeping soul. But he is afraid to understand these feelings, he does not know what is happening in him.

Olga herself fell in love with Oblomov very much. She saw in him not only what everyone saw, but also what few people noticed: his tenderness and purity, his inability to lie and do mean things. Stolz also noticed these properties of Oblomov’s soul. Perhaps because Stolz and Olga were very similar; they had common interests, common goals. Olga hoped to awaken a thirst for life in Oblomov, she thought that he would change thanks to her, she wanted to convey her interests to him.

But Oblomov, as soon as he returned from Olga and crossed the threshold of his house, found himself in an atmosphere of laziness and inactivity: no need to get used to anything, ordinary surroundings, ordinary people, ordinary news. Everything fell into its usual place. Because of imaginary fears, it was inconvenient and too lazy to show up at Olga’s house; I was afraid to meet her: what if someone thought something?

Oblomov had no choice but doze, dreams and useless thoughts. Although, if he had listened to Olga, everything would have been different. But this did not happen.

This is how he spent the rest of his life. What influenced him so much, what pressed him with its unmeasurable weight? - Oblomovism!

In it the writer created an unforgettable image extra person. When starting to write the novel, the author set a goal to tell the reader about the life of “an honest and kind, sympathetic nature, a highly idealist, who has been struggling all his life, truth seeker, encountering lies at every step, being deceived and falling into apathy and powerlessness.”

But the reader’s attention is presented with a broader picture than just the life of the main character - Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. Goncharov's novel reproduces the era of the 40-50s of the 19th century and provides a vivid canvas of landowner Oblomovka and bureaucratic Petersburg with its kaleidoscope of social types - from serf servants to representatives of the capital's nobility.

The main character of the novel, Oblomov Ilya Ilyich, is a man “about thirty-two or three years old, of average height, pleasant appearance, with dark gray eyes, but with the absence of any definite idea, any concentration in his facial features... softness was dominant and fundamental expression, not just of the face, but of the whole soul; and the soul shone so openly and clearly in the eyes, in the smile, in every movement of the head and hand.” This is how the reader finds the hero at the beginning of the novel, in St. Petersburg, on Gorokhovaya Street, where he lives with his servant Zakhar. From the chapter “Oblomov’s Dream,” as well as from individual strokes scattered throughout the text, the reader learns about the hero’s childhood and youth. He grew up and was brought up among people who understood life as “the ideal of peace and inaction,” and considered work to be punishment.

Life in Oblomovka and the habit of doing everything with the help of other people developed apathetic immobility in the hero. The entire novel is the story of a man who slowly but surely plunges into the quagmire of apathy. A different type of character is revealed in the image of Andrei Stolz - German on his father's side, Russian on his mother's side. Since childhood, Andrey developed such traits as initiative and hard work. He cannot understand Oblomov and does not lose hope of reviving him to life. Leaving abroad once again, Andrei entrusts the care of his friend Olga Ilyinskaya, a young girl devoid of social falsehood and coquetry. She tried to change Oblomov, to force him to live a different, active and thinking life. But they understood the ideal of life differently. Saying goodbye to Ilya, Olga says: “I only recently found out that I loved what I wanted in you, what Stolz showed me, what we invented with him. I loved the future Oblomov! You are meek and honest, Ilya; you are gentle... like a dove; you hide your head under your wing - and don’t want anything more; you’re ready to coo under the roof all your life... but I’m not like that: this is not enough for me, I need something else, but I don’t know what!”

Oblomov himself understands that he is not worthy of Olga, although he loves her sincerely and disinterestedly. Their love story is beautiful and romantic, but it cannot have a continuation, because Ilya and Olga - different people. If he imagines the future in quiet, calm walks in the garden, pleasant conversations, meeting guests, then for her it is a continuous movement forward. But it was Olga who was able to discern other character traits of Oblomov inherent in an integral nature: honesty, openness, ability to deep feelings. All these qualities are alien to the businessmen and careerists who periodically appear at Ilya Ilyich’s sofa. Each of them, talking about their activities and problems, represents one or another version of an active and active life, which reality offers the hero instead of lying on the sofa. After each guest leaves, the owner sums up the conversation with him and makes a negative assessment. Oblomov is not at all attracted to either a career or social success, because he sees in them only useless vanity. His soul requires something sublime and beautiful, for which it is worth getting off the couch. Having grown up in the bosom of Russian nature, among peace and quiet, surrounded by care and affection, he could not find himself in the calculating and bustling world of a big city, in a society in which, in his opinion, there are no “interests of the mind, heart, no universal sympathy” .

Possessing enormous power of generalization, the image of Oblomov belongs to the “eternal” images of not only Russian, but also world literature. The figure of the main character is ambiguous and evokes different opinions among readers. Some see in him a sage and contemplator, a man with a kind, “dove” heart. Others note mainly his laziness and apathy, uselessness and worthlessness. But the author, while working on the novel, sought to ensure that the reader would combine all the images of the work into one whole and be able to get an idea of ​​Russian life and the problems relevant to this time. Talking about the life of the main character, Goncharov showed such a broad concept as Oblomovism. On the one hand, it includes the entire patriarchal way of Russian life with its idle sleepiness, cult of food, desire for peace and quiet, and on the other hand, poetry, kindness and love. The word “Oblomovism” is first uttered by Stolz, a friend of Ilya Ilyich and his antipode. When Andrei realizes that there is no hope for Oblomov’s revival to life, he exclaims: “He’s dead... He’s lost forever!”, and later tells Olga that “Oblomovism” reigns in Ilya’s house. This concept becomes both key and fatal for the main character. All attempts by Andrei Stolts and Olga Ilyinskaya to revive Ilya Ilyich are unsuccessful: the quagmire of apathy takes over and absorbs the living and pure beginning of the hero, leading his personality to death - first moral, and then physical. This is the result of the life of a kind and thoughtful person, capable of bringing great benefit to society under other conditions. The origins of his tragedy are rooted in the social structure of patriarchal Russia. The hero's laziness and apathy are the result of upbringing and surrounding circumstances. It is “”, rightly named by N.A. Dobrolyubov's trait of Russian national character, crippled the fate of the main character and destroyed him. And this was very painful for Oblomov himself, who “painfully felt that some good, bright beginning was buried in him, as in a grave, perhaps now dead...” Self-esteem, inner freedom, which attracted the main character, both Olga and Stolz, cannot leave the reader indifferent.

The word “Oblomovism” became a household word thanks to the critic N.A. Dobrolyubov. In his article, he examined in detail the problem raised by Goncharov and which has not lost its relevance today. Ilya Ilyich, sharing his thoughts with Stolz, says: “Our name is legion,” and he is absolutely right. The phenomenon of Oblomovism, which drowns out the will and strength of spirit for the sake of peace and serene well-being, can destroy many people. Therefore, each of us must think about it, see in time and eradicate the signs of this mental illness, which can “plunge a person into a miserable state of moral slavery.”

Goncharov managed to create an amazing, one might even say, the only image in literature - The entire work is unique, there are no sharp turns in the plot, the setting almost never changes (the entire first part it was the protagonist’s apartment), but nevertheless you worry about the characters. An image like Oblomov cannot but cause controversy about his character and understanding of life.

The novel does not raise political issues; it only touches on personal and interpersonal conflicts, which remain relevant in any era. Goncharov's novel is studied at school, and writing an essay on Oblomov's theme is mandatory in the literature program. They rise there serious questions of a moral nature that make the reader think while reading.

Essay topics on "Oblomov"

The list of topics on which you are asked to write an essay is quite extensive, so the most interesting ones will be presented below.

1. "Love theme in the work "Oblomov".
2. Essay on the topic "Oblomov and Stolz".
3. "Historical and philosophical meaning of the novel "Oblomov".
4. "Oblomov and Oblomovism."
5. "Oblomov's childhood in the novel "Oblomov".

Relations between Oblomov and Stolz

An essay on the topic “Oblomov and Stolz” is both simple and difficult to write. Simple, because these are two main characters with clearly defined characters, with clear and understandable life principles. But their friendship is not as simple as it might seem.

After all, they not only respect and value each other, but they are also opposites, which cannot but affect their attitude towards each other’s lifestyle. If at some point in his life Ilya tries to accept the point of view of his comrade, then Andrei sharply criticizes “Oblomovism” and does not even try to understand why Ilya Ilyich is so attracted to a solitary lifestyle.

But this does not prevent them from remaining close and only friends throughout their lives. After all, only Stoltz Oblomov could tell about his experiences, and he, in turn, is always ready to help his friend.

Discussion about "Oblomovism"

An essay on the topic “Oblomov’s Life” will not be distinguished by any bright events that could happen to the main character, but it will be interesting in how the main character’s life principles changed. A very true and accurate description of the life of Ilya Ilyich was given by his friend Andrei Stolts - “Oblomovism”.

An essay on the theme of Oblomov differs from discussions about other works precisely in that greater emphasis in the novel itself is placed precisely on inner world main character. Of course, the character of other heroes is also told, but Oblomov himself is created in such a way that his lifestyle cannot be of much interest to the reader.

It is much more important to understand why he has such a craving for a solitary and monotonous life. And the reason lies in his childhood, where every day was similar to one another, where his parents did not burden themselves with serious matters or thoughts and were happy.

But if the son had been like them, then he would not have thought about Stolz’s words, he would not have understood that times have changed, that living this way is not entirely correct. But because Oblomov was not educated at home, he was brought up philosophical beginning, which prompted him to various thoughts.

But despite all Stolz’s attempts to take his friend away from that monotonous course of life, Oblomov still returned to his roots. Because the basis of his character was this monotony, unhurriedness, a sense of calm in this measured way of life and actions.

Assessing the Main Character's Personality

In an essay on the topic of Oblomov, it will be quite difficult to give any unambiguous assessment central character. On the one hand, this way of life is wrong in that gradually a person weanes himself from making responsible decisions, becomes lazy, and not purposeful. Gradually, his personal development may stop due to a narrow circle of friends and narrowing interests. After all, self-education requires willpower and discipline, which is lost with such a lifestyle. Therefore, Ilya Ilyich had doubts and a desire to change his lifestyle.

But, on the other hand, the formation of his character was greatly influenced by the environment and environment in which he grew up. And he associated this feeling of calm and stability with such a measured way of life. For him, it remained an ideal, so at the end of the novel, despite all the efforts of Stolz and Olga, he returns to his previous philosophy.

In an essay on the topic of Oblomov, one can also point out that the example of the Oblomovs shows how the old lordly way of life was replaced, that people became more educated, and progress reached housekeeping. Oblomov and Stolz were a reflection of the opposing public opinions that reigned in the country at that time. Therefore, despite the lack of a wide variety of characters and changes in setting, this novel became classic work, whose relevance continues to persist over time.